Bill Park is a member of the "P&C" Seminar. He was in Rome last April, participating in the Convegno.
Here is the Bill Park review The Passion of the Christ: Five Questions which will appear in the March Position Paper. As he said to John Wauck it may have some relevance for "Poetics and Christianity". Peter Robinson (Uncommon Knowledge, PBS) put the last question on a National Review Chat site and the response was overwhelmingly negative, in part even abusive.
[JJGN: I have numerate each one of the Five Questions, in order to facilitate the dialogue. By the way, the film soars beyond $200 million in his second weekend]:
The Passion of the Christ: Five Questions
1. Why all the hubbub?
In all my years of film going, I do not recall any movie that has caused such a hubbub. Gone with the Wind (1939) comes to mind, but all the hype about that movie centered on two questions: who would play Scarlet O’Hara; and can a huge best selling novel be successfully translated onto the screen? Needless to say, Mel Gibson's The Passion of the Christ raises more serious questions. It's curious that earlier Hollywood versions of the Gospels, King of Kings (1927 and 1961) and The Greatest Story Ever Told (1965), caused no such outcries. Admittedly, Gibson's treatment is more graphic and horrifying than anything done previously, but since in the chorus of detractors one hears many secular voices, one suspects the real offence is Christianity itself. In an age in which among the educated elite, tolerance and inclusion stand as the only virtues, in which Christians are regarded as bigots and Christianity oppressive, and in which what religion exists tends toward New Age spirituality, Gibson’s in your face assertion of a Christian perspective can only scandalize. Gibson is not far from St. Paul when he claimed, "We preach Christ crucified, unto the Jews a stumbling block, and the Greeks foolishness."